PAIN REHABILITATION CENTRES…

skull pic

Pain rehabilitation centres are for people suffering from chronic pain. You are initially assessed by a team of different clinicians who then spend time finding out about your pain and how it affects your life.

They look at the medication you are taking and your experiences of other types of pain treatment. If they think the programme might held you then send you forward for the rehabilitation programme.

Not all patients with pain are suitable for pain rehab programmes or would benefit from one and some patients do better having received on than others, but overall the results are good.

Of course not all areas have access to pain rehabilitation programmes but your GP should know where your nearest one is located.

Arthritis Research UK is producing an authoritative report on living with chronic pain, aimed at people like myself. It will be available in 2012 with more details being put into Arthritis Today magazine.

Advertisements

13 thoughts on “PAIN REHABILITATION CENTRES…

  1. functions to be performed”Tiffany argued that the District Court did not analyze whether the Red Soel Mark was essential to the use and purpose of Louboutin’s shoes, nor did it address how the function of Christian louboutin outleta shoe “dictates” that the sole be covered entirely in red lacquer. It is clear, says Tiffany and the AmeriKat, that it would be a stretch for a court to hold that the red sole is dictated by the

    escape,” says Trevor Davis, a consumer product expert with International Business Machines’ Global Business Services unit, in a press release. IBM conducted a study of social media posts and is predicting that women’s heel heights, which are currently in nosebleed territory, are poised to come back down to Earth. “This time, something different is happening — perhaps a mood of long-term austerity

    Co., the US Court of Appeals forChristian Louboutin Women’s Pumps the Ninth Circuit applied the aesthetic functionality doctrine and found that the defendant was entitled to copy the plaintiff’s china designs, since the attractiveness of the design was the primary selling feature of the china and thereby served a non-trademark function. However, the Second Circuit specifically rejected the Pagliero test for aesthetic functionalit

    igners themselves to find out exactly how they all happenedTiffany & Co. (TIF), the luxury jewelry company, submitted a friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of Christian Louboutin SA in the Christian Louboutin Women’s SlingbakFrench shoe designer’s trademark battle with Yves St. Laurent America.Louboutin sued St. Laurent in federal court in Manhattan in April, claiming the use of red shoe soles by St. Laurent infringed its trademarks

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s